Volume 1, issue 1 (Spring 2025) – SciPinion Collective Wisdom Hub

This interactive tool allows you to explore the relationships between various risk factors and birth outcomes. The data is based on a comprehensive analysis conducted by a blinded panel of 28 international subject matter experts who evaluated each risk factor-outcome relationship using a numerical weight of evidence rating scale or left blank if this was not their area of expertise. The scale ranges from “0” (no evidence) to “5” (strong evidence), using whole number entries only. Each data point represents the averaged expert assessments, providing a systematic evaluation of the strength of evidence for each relationship between risk factors and birth outcomes. By clicking the chevron at the far left of each entry in the table you may view further detail on that entry.

The survey responses reveal a strong negative sentiment regarding the current US administration’s approach to science funding. 63% of experts reported “very negative” impacts on their research fields, while an additional 13% reported “somewhat negative” impacts. Only 10% of experts indicated positive effects (either “somewhat” or “very” positive), and 14% reported no significant impact or that the question was not applicable to their work.

The survey reveals a strong consensus among experts regarding the sustainability of the current journal peer review system. 63% of respondents believe the system is not sustainable with increasing submission volumes, while only 29% believe it is sustainable. The remaining 8% were unsure.

Survey results on the question “Is the quality of peer reviews you receive declining?” show a divided scientific community. Among the 159 respondents, 47% answered “Yes,” 37% answered “No,” and 16% were “Unsure.”

The survey data shows that the vast majority of experts have completed peer reviews recently. 58% of respondents (196 experts) reported completing a peer review “within the past week,” while 23% (77 experts) completed one “within the past month.” Another 10% (33 experts) reported completing reviews “within the past 3 months,” with smaller percentages reporting longer timeframes.

A strong majority of experts (76%) agree that alcohol consumption poses as large a risk of cancer as indicated in the Surgeon General’s report. Only 11% disagree, while 13% remain unsure.

In a 2024 science news survey, record-breaking global temperatures emerged as the most significant story, selected by 25 experts (38%). Several experts emphasized its global impact and implications for humanity’s future, with one noting “climate change is still not being addressed adequately.”