Skip to main content

SciPoll Results

A SciPoll quickly assesses the prevailing wisdom on a specialized topic. It should take less than 1 minute of the expert’s time to answer and not require additional reading or research from the expert..

SciPoll 687 Results

Fluoride in Drinking Water – Risk Assessment & Policy Implications

This SciPoll explored expert perspectives on recent developments in water fluoridation practices and policies. When asked about the importance of reassessing current fluoridation policies, 53% of experts rated it as “very important,” highlighting the need for updated risk-benefit analyses based on current scientific understanding. The poll revealed diverse views on the World Health Organization’s suggested… Read More

View More
SciPoll 685 Results

Funding Bias in Scientific Research

Our SciPoll examined how funding sources influence scientific research and credibility. The majority of participating experts rated funding bias as “very important” or “extremely important” in scientific research. Trust levels varied significantly across different funding sources. Government-funded research received the highest trust ratings, with 63% of experts indicating high or complete trust. NGO-funded research followed… Read More

View More
SciPoll 684 Results

Impact of Misleading Abstracts

The scientific abstract serves as a critical gateway to research findings, yet concerns about misleading or incomplete abstracts have grown within the scientific community. Our latest SciPoll engaged experts to understand the scope and impact of this issue on scientific communication and decision-making. Our SciPoll focused on the occurrence of misleading abstracts. When we asked… Read More

View More
SciPoll 683 Results

Scientists’ Evolving Views on AI – One Year Later

This SciPoll follows up on another SciPoll from a year ago, reassessing our community’s sentiments regarding AI. While overall optimism remains high, with nearly 70% of respondents feeling somewhat or very optimistic about AI’s potential to improve their areas of expertise, we’ve observed some modest shifts over the past year. There’s been a modest rise… Read More

View More
SciPoll 682 Results

Overhyped Scientific Findings

Overhyped scientific findings aren’t just a media problem—they’re affecting the careers and lives of scientists. As exaggerated claims make headlines, researchers are left to deal with the fallout, from misplaced public trust to pressures within academia. This trend poses significant challenges to the integrity of scientific communication and can have far-reaching consequences for researchers’ careers… Read More

View More
SciPoll 648 Results

Public trust in science & scientists

Our survey aimed to explore your experiences and insights regarding the erosion of public trust in science and its impact on the application of research findings. The relationship between scientific research and public trust is crucial for the effective implementation of evidence-based policies and practices. However, recent trends indicate a growing skepticism towards scientific findings… Read More

View More
SciPoll 647 Results

Misinterpretation of Results in Scientific Publishing

This SciPoll sought to understand the challenges and consequences of result misinterpretation in scientific literature.

View More
SciPoll 644 Results

How are you affected by publishing pressures?

The goal of this SciPoll was to understand if members of our community was facing pressures from publishers.

View More
SciPoll 642 Results

The impact of poor media coverage on Scientific Communication

The goal of this SciPoll was to learn the opinion of our community on the impact of poor media coverage on the scientific community.

View More
SciPoll 640 Results

Impact of publication bias

This SciPoll sought to understand our communities opinions on publication bias in scientific publishing.

View More